We break down overall class win rates, spec performance, class-vs-class matchup counters, and recorded finals talent builds.
On This Page
Strongest Classes and Specs Overall
Class performance at level 30 separates into distinct tiers. Paladin and Warlock lead all classes by a substantial margin, each exceeding a 59% overall win rate across nearly 1,000 or more recorded duels. Conversely, Warrior sits at the bottom with a 40.1% win rate.
Overall Win Rate by Class
The table below compiles every recorded non-bye tournament duel. Overall win rate counts mirror matches (which add 1 win and 1 loss per encounter), while non-mirror win rate isolates cross-class matchups.
| Rank | Class | Wins (Duels) | Losses (Duels) | Total Duels | Overall Win % | Non-Mirror Win % | Sample Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | Paladin | 601 | 381 | 982 | 61.2% | 61.7% | Reliable (n=982) |
| #2 | Warlock | 660 | 446 | 1106 | 59.7% | 60.2% | Reliable (n=1106) |
| #3 | Priest | 737 | 659 | 1396 | 52.8% | 52.8% | Reliable (n=1396) |
| #4 | Mage | 318 | 344 | 662 | 48.0% | 48.0% | Reliable (n=662) |
| #5 | Hunter | 820 | 913 | 1733 | 47.3% | 47.3% | Reliable (n=1733) |
| #6 | Rogue | 586 | 676 | 1262 | 46.4% | 46.4% | Reliable (n=1262) |
| #7 | Shaman | 726 | 846 | 1572 | 46.2% | 46.1% | Reliable (n=1572) |
| #8 | Druid | 315 | 383 | 698 | 45.1% | 45.1% | Reliable (n=698) |
| #9 | Warrior | 233 | 348 | 581 | 40.1% | 40.0% | Reliable (n=581) |
How Each Spec Performed
The 36 finalists' recorded finals talent builds determine the spec labels below. Raider.IO records talent builds only for finals matches, and players could change builds between stages, so the qualifier columns show each finalist's qualifier results under the spec they played in the finals.
Combined records describe those players across both stages, rather than proving a spec was used in qualifiers.Source: Raider.IO finals rules, §§6.5 and 8.3.
| Class | Spec | Qualifiers (W-L Duels) | Qual Duels (n) | Qual Win % | Finals (W-L Duels) | Finals Duels (n) | Finals Win % | Total Duels (W-L) | Total Duels (n) | Total Win % | Players |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Warlock | Demonology | 31-0 | 31 | 100.0% | 35-16 | 51 | 68.6% | 66-16 | 82 | 80.5% | 4 |
| Shaman | 11/15 Enhancement/Restoration hybrid | 7-1 | 8 | 87.5% | 9-3 | 12 | 75.0% | 16-4 | 20 | 80.0% | 1 |
| Paladin | Retribution | 31-0 | 31 | 100.0% | 17-14 | 31 | 54.8% | 48-14 | 62 | 77.4% | 4 |
| Shaman | Enhancement | 12-0 | 12 | 100.0% | 8-7 | 15 | 53.3% | 20-7 | 27 | 74.1% | 2 |
| Priest | Discipline | 24-0 | 24 | 100.0% | 9-12 | 21 | 42.9% | 33-12 | 45 | 73.3% | 4 |
| Druid | Feral | 6-1 | 7 | 85.7% | 3-3 | 6 | 50.0% | 9-4 | 13 | 69.2% | 1 |
| Shaman | 12/14 Enhancement/Restoration hybrid | 5-1 | 6 | 83.3% | 4-3 | 7 | 57.1% | 9-4 | 13 | 69.2% | 1 |
| Hunter | Beast Mastery | 11-1 | 12 | 91.7% | 4-6 | 10 | 40.0% | 15-7 | 22 | 68.2% | 2 |
| Hunter | Survival | 11-1 | 12 | 91.7% | 4-6 | 10 | 40.0% | 15-7 | 22 | 68.2% | 2 |
| Druid | Restoration | 16-1 | 17 | 94.1% | 9-11 | 20 | 45.0% | 25-12 | 37 | 67.6% | 3 |
| Rogue | Subtlety | 22-2 | 24 | 91.7% | 6-12 | 18 | 33.3% | 28-14 | 42 | 66.7% | 4 |
| Mage | Arcane | 11-2 | 13 | 84.6% | 4-6 | 10 | 40.0% | 15-8 | 23 | 65.2% | 2 |
| Warrior | Arms | 11-2 | 13 | 84.6% | 3-6 | 9 | 33.3% | 14-8 | 22 | 63.6% | 2 |
| Warrior | Protection | 5-1 | 6 | 83.3% | 2-3 | 5 | 40.0% | 7-4 | 11 | 63.6% | 1 |
| Mage | Frost | 11-1 | 12 | 91.7% | 0-6 | 6 | 0.0% | 11-7 | 18 | 61.1% | 2 |
| Warrior | Fury | 5-1 | 6 | 83.3% | 0-3 | 3 | 0.0% | 5-4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 |
Note: All 36 finalists entered the tournament via 6 Swiss rounds. In finals, double-elimination matches are best-of-3 (upper bracket), best-of-1 (lower bracket, except the best-of-3 lower final), or best-of-5 (grand final, with no bracket reset).
Top PvP Spec for Each Class
Selection rule: The top spec for each of the nine classes is selected by highest win rate across combined tournament play among specs meeting a minimum sample size threshold of n >= 15 combined duels (qualifiers + finals). Specs with fewer than 15 duels are noted where relevant but excluded from top-spec designation to prevent small-sample distortion.
| Class | Top Spec | Qualifiers (W-L Duels) | Qual Duels (n) | Qual Win % | Finals (W-L Duels) | Finals Duels (n) | Finals Win % | Total Duels (W-L) | Total Duels (n) | Total Win % | Players |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Warlock | Demonology | 31-0 | 31 | 100.0% | 35-16 | 51 | 68.6% | 66-16 | 82 | 80.5% | 4 |
| Shaman | 11/15 Enh/Resto hybrid | 7-1 | 8 | 87.5% | 9-3 | 12 | 75.0% | 16-4 | 20 | 80.0% | 1 |
| Paladin | Retribution | 31-0 | 31 | 100.0% | 17-14 | 31 | 54.8% | 48-14 | 62 | 77.4% | 4 |
| Priest | Discipline | 24-0 | 24 | 100.0% | 9-12 | 21 | 42.9% | 33-12 | 45 | 73.3% | 4 |
| Hunter | Beast Mastery (Tied) | 11-1 | 12 | 91.7% | 4-6 | 10 | 40.0% | 15-7 | 22 | 68.2% | 2 |
| Hunter | Survival (Tied) | 11-1 | 12 | 91.7% | 4-6 | 10 | 40.0% | 15-7 | 22 | 68.2% | 2 |
| Druid | Restoration | 16-1 | 17 | 94.1% | 9-11 | 20 | 45.0% | 25-12 | 37 | 67.6% | 3 |
| Rogue | Subtlety | 22-2 | 24 | 91.7% | 6-12 | 18 | 33.3% | 28-14 | 42 | 66.7% | 4 |
| Mage | Arcane | 11-2 | 13 | 84.6% | 4-6 | 10 | 40.0% | 15-8 | 23 | 65.2% | 2 |
| Warrior | Arms | 11-2 | 13 | 84.6% | 3-6 | 9 | 33.3% | 14-8 | 22 | 63.6% | 2 |
1. Warlock: Demonology
- Tournament Record: 66-16 (80.5% duel win rate, n=82 duels combined; Qualifiers: 31-0, Finals: 35-16)
- Why this spec: All four Warlock finalists ran 5/21/0 Demonology, taking Improved Corruption in Affliction and Demonic Embrace, Fel Domination, Demonic Sacrifice, and Soul Link in Demonology. These finalists recorded a 31-0 record in Swiss qualifiers and playoff tiebreakers and 35-16 in finals (80.5% combined win rate across 82 duels), culminating in Warlockguy winning the Grand Championship.
- Tournament outcome: Champion and Class Award: Warlockguy won the 50,000 USD championship with a 3-1 Grand Final victory over fellow Demonology specialist Neepzen. Per tournament rules, the 5,555 USD Warlock class award passed to runner-up Neepzen.
2. Shaman: 11/15 Enhancement/Restoration Hybrid
- Tournament Record: 16-4 (80.0% duel win rate, n=20 duels combined; Qualifiers: 7-1, Finals: 9-3)
- Why this spec: Run by 4th-place finisher Oddwaffletv (0/11/15), allocating points into Thundering Strikes, Mental Dexterity, Improved Ghost Wolf, and Shamanistic Focus in Enhancement alongside Totemic Focus, Tidal Focus, Healing Focus, and Water Shield in Restoration. Oddwaffletv went 7-1 in qualifiers and 9-3 in finals (80.0% win rate across 20 duels). Enhancement-focused finalists (Skeelz at 0/23/3 and Cdewx at 0/24/2) achieved 20-7 (74.1% win rate, n=27 duels), while Luuxiå's 0/12/14 split recorded 9-4 (69.2% win rate, n=13 duels).
- Tournament outcome: 3rd and 4th Place Finishes: Cdewx reached Lower Bracket Round 10 (Lower Finals) to secure 3rd place overall and the 5,555 USD Shaman class prize, while Oddwaffletv finished 4th overall after Lower Round 9.
3. Paladin: Retribution
- Tournament Record: 48-14 (77.4% duel win rate, n=62 duels combined; Qualifiers: 31-0, Finals: 17-14)
- Why this spec: All four Paladin finalists ran 0/0/26 Retribution, allocating points into Seal of Command, Pursuit of Justice, Repentance, Sacred Arbiter, Conviction, and Sanctified Judgement. These finalists recorded a 31-0 record in Swiss qualifiers and playoff tiebreakers and 17-14 in finals, finishing with an overall 77.4% duel win rate across 62 duels.
- Tournament outcome: 5th Place and Class Award: Azzu advanced furthest among Paladins to Lower Bracket Round 8 (tied 5th overall) to claim the 5,555 USD Paladin class award (Lamelol finished Lower R7, Gomzy Lower R6, Reed Lower R4).
4. Priest: Discipline
- Tournament Record: 33-12 (73.3% duel win rate, n=45 duels combined; Qualifiers: 24-0, Finals: 9-12)
- Why this spec: All four Priest finalists ran 23 points in Discipline, taking Penance, Inner Focus, Meditation (3/3), Improved Inner Fire, and Improved Mana Burn (2/2); Nieze and Psychapeute also took Mental Strength. These builds were paired with Twilight Focus in Holy (Nieze, Dakkroth, Psychapeute) or Shadow Focus (2/5) and Blackout (1/5) in Shadow (Lash). These Priest finalists went 24-0 in Swiss qualifiers and finished 33-12 overall (73.3% duel win rate across 45 duels).
- Tournament outcome: Tied 9th and Class Award: Nieze advanced to Lower Bracket Round 6 (tied 9th overall) to win the 5,555 USD Priest class award (Dakkroth finished Lower R5, Lash Lower R4, Psychapeute Lower R2).
5. Hunter: Beast Mastery and Survival (Tied)
- Tournament Record: 15-7 each (68.2% duel win rate, n=22 duels combined; Qualifiers: 11-1, Finals: 4-6)
- Why these specs: Beast Mastery (Danmark, Hardfight at 26/0/0) and Survival (Fvp, Ryhaz at 0/0/26) tied with identical 15-7 records (11-1 in qualifiers, 4-6 in finals, 68.2% win rate across 22 duels each). Beast Mastery allocated points into Intimidation, Summon Hawk, Bestial Swiftness, and Spirit Bond, while Survival allocated points into Strider Kick, Deterrence, Counterattack, and Clever Traps.
- Tournament outcome: Tied 13th and Class Award: Fvp (Survival) advanced furthest among Hunters to Lower Bracket Round 5 (tied 13th overall) to claim the 5,555 USD Hunter class award (Danmark, Hardfight, and Ryhaz finished Lower R4).
6. Druid: Restoration
- Tournament Record: 25-12 (67.6% duel win rate, n=37 duels combined; Qualifiers: 16-1, Finals: 9-11)
- Why this spec: Three Druid finalists (Minpojke, Sodapoppin at 0/0/26, and Desmondhume at 3/0/23) ran Restoration, all taking Nature's Swiftness, Swiftmend, Reflection, and Naturalist; Minpojke and Sodapoppin also took Gift of the Earthmother. These Restoration finalists went 16-1 in qualifiers and 9-11 in finals (67.6% win rate across 37 duels). Snupy's Feral Combat build (0/23/3 with Feral Charge, Brutal Impact, Leader of the Pack, Primal Bite, Savage Fury, and Natural Instinct) recorded 9-4 (69.2% win rate, n=13 duels), falling below the 15-duel qualification threshold.
- Tournament outcome: 5th Place and Class Award: Minpojke advanced to Lower Bracket Round 8 (tied 5th overall) to claim the 5,555 USD Druid class award (Sodapoppin finished Lower R5, Desmondhume Lower R3, Snupy Lower R3).
7. Rogue: Subtlety
- Tournament Record: 28-14 (66.7% duel win rate, n=42 duels combined; Qualifiers: 22-2, Finals: 6-12)
- Why this spec: All four Rogue finalists ran deep Subtlety (Justwoo at 0/0/26, Chopmaster at 1/0/25, Pshero and Kyroo at 2/0/24), allocating points into Preparation, Hemorrhage, Premeditation, Ghostly Strike, and Serrated Blades; Justwoo, Pshero, and Kyroo also took Setup, and Chopmaster, Pshero, and Kyroo put their Assassination points into Improved Gouge. These finalists recorded 22-2 in Swiss qualifiers and 6-12 in finals (66.7% win rate across 42 duels).
- Tournament outcome: Tied 13th and Class Award: Justwoo advanced furthest among Rogues to Lower Bracket Round 5 (tied 13th overall) to capture the 5,555 USD Rogue class award (Chopmaster and Pshero finished Lower R4, Kyroo Lower R2).
8. Mage: Arcane
- Tournament Record: 15-8 (65.2% duel win rate, n=23 duels combined; Qualifiers: 11-2, Finals: 4-6)
- Why this spec: Run by Allyana (26/0/0) and Teleporter (22/0/4), allocating points into Presence of Mind, Missile Barrage, Arcane Wrath, Arcane Blast, and Improved Counterspell; Teleporter also took Arcane Concentration (1/5). These finalists went 11-2 in Swiss qualifiers and 4-6 in finals (65.2% win rate across 23 duels), outperforming Frost (Yonezka and Venruk at 2/0/24 with Ice Block, Cold Snap, and Shatter), which recorded 11-7 (61.1% win rate, n=18 duels).
- Tournament outcome: Four-Way Prize Split: All four Mage finalists (Teleporter, Yonezka, Venruk, and Allyana) were eliminated in Lower Bracket Round 3 (tied 25th to 32nd overall). Under tournament rules, the 5,555 USD Mage class prize is split equally among the four players (about 1,389 USD each).
9. Warrior: Arms
- Tournament Record: 14-8 (63.6% duel win rate, n=22 duels combined; Qualifiers: 11-2, Finals: 3-6)
- Why this spec: Run by Disruptive and Bcw (both 26/0/0), allocating points into Bloodthrill, Impale, Deep Wounds, Anger Management, and Improved Tactical Mastery. These finalists recorded 11-2 in Swiss qualifiers and 3-6 in finals (63.6% win rate across 22 duels). Mag's Protection build (0/0/26 with Concussion Blow, Last Stand, and Improved Shield Wall) went 7-4 (63.6% win rate, n=11 duels), and Fracc's Fury build (0/26/0 with Death Wish, Piercing Howl, and Blood Craze) went 5-4 (55.6% win rate, n=9 duels), both falling below the 15-duel minimum.
- Tournament outcome: Tied 17th and Class Award: Mag (Protection) survived furthest among Warriors by reaching Lower Bracket Round 4 (tied 17th overall) to claim the 5,555 USD Warrior class award (Disruptive finished Lower R3, Bcw and Fracc Lower R2).
Head-to-Head Matchup Matrix
The 9x9 matrix compiles all non-mirror, non-bye completed tournament duels. Each cell displays row-class win rate against column-class opponent, with total wins and losses.
| Class | WAR | PAL | HUN | ROG | PRI | SHA | MAG | WLK | DRU |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Warrior | Mirror | 17% (9-45) | 50% (55-54) | 49% (38-39) | 29% (25-61) | 56% (56-44) | 33% (11-22) | 31% (20-44) | 31% (16-36) |
| Paladin | 83% (45-9) | Mirror | 66% (120-62) | 60% (76-50) | 62% (95-58) | 68% (113-54) | 44% (32-40) | 48% (62-67) | 65% (37-20) |
| Hunter | 50% (54-55) | 34% (62-120) | Mirror | 42% (109-152) | 46% (146-174) | 60% (227-153) | 53% (67-60) | 40% (83-122) | 48% (65-70) |
| Rogue | 51% (39-38) | 40% (50-76) | 58% (152-109) | Mirror | 26% (56-156) | 63% (147-88) | 35% (34-64) | 35% (49-90) | 52% (51-47) |
| Priest | 71% (61-25) | 38% (58-95) | 54% (174-146) | 74% (156-56) | Mirror | 44% (113-145) | 60% (61-40) | 37% (62-105) | 53% (47-42) |
| Shaman | 44% (44-56) | 32% (54-113) | 40% (153-227) | 37% (88-147) | 56% (145-113) | Mirror | 53% (60-53) | 49% (89-92) | 70% (83-35) |
| Mage | 67% (22-11) | 56% (40-32) | 47% (60-67) | 65% (64-34) | 40% (40-61) | 47% (53-60) | Mirror | 26% (18-51) | 43% (20-27) |
| Warlock | 69% (44-20) | 52% (67-62) | 60% (122-83) | 65% (90-49) | 63% (105-62) | 51% (92-89) | 74% (51-18) | Mirror | 63% (62-36) |
| Druid | 69% (36-16) | 35% (20-37) | 52% (70-65) | 48% (47-51) | 47% (42-47) | 30% (35-83) | 57% (27-20) | 37% (36-62) | Mirror |
Class Matchup Counters and Favorable Pairings
Matchup profiles below evaluate cross-class performance meeting the minimum sample size rule of n >= 25 duels. Hard counters are defined strictly as matchups with a win rate of <= 40.0%.
Warrior
Warrior: best vs Shaman 56% (n=100) ; hard counter: Paladin 17% (n=54)
- Favorable (Beats Opponent >= 55% win rate, n >= 25): Shaman 56-44 (n=100, 56.0%)
- Even / Competitive (40.1% to 54.9% win rate, n >= 25): Hunter 55-54 (n=109, 50.5%), Rogue 38-39 (n=77, 49.4%)
- Hard Counters (<= 40% win rate, n >= 25): Paladin 9-45 (n=54, 16.7%), Priest 25-61 (n=86, 29.1%), Druid 16-36 (n=52, 30.8%), Warlock 20-44 (n=64, 31.3%), Mage 11-22 (n=33, 33.3%)
Paladin
Paladin: best vs Warrior 83% (n=54) ; no hard counter
- Favorable (Beats Opponent >= 55% win rate, n >= 25): Warrior 45-9 (n=54, 83.3%), Hunter 120-62 (n=182, 65.9%), Rogue 76-50 (n=126, 60.3%), Priest 95-58 (n=153, 62.1%), Shaman 113-54 (n=167, 67.7%), Druid 37-20 (n=57, 64.9%)
- Even / Competitive (40.1% to 54.9% win rate, n >= 25): Mage 32-40 (n=72, 44.4%), Warlock 62-67 (n=129, 48.1%)
- Hard Counters (<= 40% win rate, n >= 25): no hard counter
Hunter
Hunter: best vs Shaman 60% (n=380) ; hard counter: Paladin 34% (n=182)
- Favorable (Beats Opponent >= 55% win rate, n >= 25): Shaman 227-153 (n=380, 59.7%)
- Even / Competitive (40.1% to 54.9% win rate, n >= 25): Warrior 54-55 (n=109, 49.5%), Rogue 109-152 (n=261, 41.8%), Priest 146-174 (n=320, 45.6%), Mage 67-60 (n=127, 52.8%), Warlock 83-122 (n=205, 40.5%), Druid 65-70 (n=135, 48.1%)
- Hard Counters (<= 40% win rate, n >= 25): Paladin 62-120 (n=182, 34.1%)
Rogue
Rogue: best vs Shaman 63% (n=235) ; hard counter: Priest 26% (n=212)
- Favorable (Beats Opponent >= 55% win rate, n >= 25): Hunter 152-109 (n=261, 58.2%), Shaman 147-88 (n=235, 62.6%)
- Even / Competitive (40.1% to 54.9% win rate, n >= 25): Warrior 39-38 (n=77, 50.6%), Druid 51-47 (n=98, 52.0%)
- Hard Counters (<= 40% win rate, n >= 25): Priest 56-156 (n=212, 26.4%), Mage 34-64 (n=98, 34.7%), Warlock 49-90 (n=139, 35.3%), Paladin 50-76 (n=126, 39.7%)
Priest
Priest: best vs Rogue 74% (n=212) ; hard counter: Warlock 37% (n=167)
- Favorable (Beats Opponent >= 55% win rate, n >= 25): Warrior 61-25 (n=86, 70.9%), Rogue 156-56 (n=212, 73.6%), Mage 61-40 (n=101, 60.4%)
- Even / Competitive (40.1% to 54.9% win rate, n >= 25): Hunter 174-146 (n=320, 54.4%), Shaman 113-145 (n=258, 43.8%), Druid 47-42 (n=89, 52.8%)
- Hard Counters (<= 40% win rate, n >= 25): Warlock 62-105 (n=167, 37.1%), Paladin 58-95 (n=153, 37.9%)
Shaman
Shaman: best vs Druid 70% (n=118) ; hard counter: Paladin 32% (n=167)
- Favorable (Beats Opponent >= 55% win rate, n >= 25): Priest 145-113 (n=258, 56.2%), Druid 83-35 (n=118, 70.3%)
- Even / Competitive (40.1% to 54.9% win rate, n >= 25): Warrior 44-56 (n=100, 44.0%), Hunter 153-227 (n=380, 40.3%), Mage 60-53 (n=113, 53.1%), Warlock 89-92 (n=181, 49.2%)
- Hard Counters (<= 40% win rate, n >= 25): Paladin 54-113 (n=167, 32.3%), Rogue 88-147 (n=235, 37.4%)
Mage
Mage: best vs Warrior 67% (n=33) ; hard counter: Warlock 26% (n=69)
- Favorable (Beats Opponent >= 55% win rate, n >= 25): Warrior 22-11 (n=33, 66.7%), Paladin 40-32 (n=72, 55.6%), Rogue 64-34 (n=98, 65.3%)
- Even / Competitive (40.1% to 54.9% win rate, n >= 25): Hunter 60-67 (n=127, 47.2%), Shaman 53-60 (n=113, 46.9%), Druid 20-27 (n=47, 42.6%)
- Hard Counters (<= 40% win rate, n >= 25): Warlock 18-51 (n=69, 26.1%), Priest 40-61 (n=101, 39.6%)
Warlock
Warlock: best vs Mage 74% (n=69) ; no hard counter
- Favorable (Beats Opponent >= 55% win rate, n >= 25): Warrior 44-20 (n=64, 68.8%), Hunter 122-83 (n=205, 59.5%), Rogue 90-49 (n=139, 64.7%), Priest 105-62 (n=167, 62.9%), Mage 51-18 (n=69, 73.9%), Druid 62-36 (n=98, 63.3%)
- Even / Competitive (40.1% to 54.9% win rate, n >= 25): Paladin 67-62 (n=129, 51.9%), Shaman 92-89 (n=181, 50.8%)
- Hard Counters (<= 40% win rate, n >= 25): no hard counter
Druid
Druid: best vs Warrior 69% (n=52) ; hard counter: Shaman 30% (n=118)
- Favorable (Beats Opponent >= 55% win rate, n >= 25): Warrior 36-16 (n=52, 69.2%), Mage 27-20 (n=47, 57.4%)
- Even / Competitive (40.1% to 54.9% win rate, n >= 25): Hunter 70-65 (n=135, 51.9%), Rogue 47-51 (n=98, 48.0%), Priest 42-47 (n=89, 47.2%)
- Hard Counters (<= 40% win rate, n >= 25): Shaman 35-83 (n=118, 29.7%), Paladin 20-37 (n=57, 35.1%), Warlock 36-62 (n=98, 36.7%)
Final Tournament Standings and Recorded Finals Talent Builds
The 36 finalists (top 4 players from each of the 9 classes during the October 17 Swiss qualifiers) advanced to the October 18 double-elimination finals. The table below lists all 36 finalists by class, qualifier rank, Swiss qualifying record, Buchholz score, and recorded finals talent build with point distribution.
| Class | Qualifier Rank | Player | Spec & Talents | Swiss Qualifier Record | Buchholz Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Warrior | #1 | Mag | Protection 0/0/26 | Pod 17 (5-1) | 63 |
| Warrior | #2 | Disruptive | Arms 26/0/0 | Pod 4 (5-1) | 63 |
| Warrior | #3 | Fracc | Fury 0/26/0 | Pod 27 (5-1) | 63 |
| Warrior | #4 | Bcw | Arms 26/0/0 | Pod 33 (5-1) | 54 |
| Paladin | #1 | Gomzy | Retribution 0/0/26 | Pod 4 (6-0) | 76 |
| Paladin | #2 | Lamelol | Retribution 0/0/26 | Pod 19 (6-0) | 75 |
| Paladin | #3 | Reed | Retribution 0/0/26 | Pod 5 (6-0) | 60 |
| Paladin | #4 | Azzu | Retribution 0/0/26 | Pod 23 (6-0) | 57 |
| Hunter | #1 | Fvp | Survival 0/0/26 | Pod 6 (6-0) | 70 |
| Hunter | #2 | Hardfight | Beast Mastery 26/0/0 | Pod 12 (6-0) | 63 |
| Hunter | #3 | Danmark | Beast Mastery 26/0/0 | Pod 30 (5-1) | 72 |
| Hunter | #4 | Ryhaz | Survival 0/0/26 | Pod 5 (5-1) | 71 |
| Rogue | #1 | Pshero | Subtlety 2/0/24 | Pod 37 (6-0) | 60 |
| Rogue | #2 | Justwoo | Subtlety 0/0/26 | Pod 34 (6-0) | 58 |
| Rogue | #3 | Chopmaster | Subtlety 1/0/25 | Pod 34 (5-1) | 72 |
| Rogue | #4 | Kyroo | Subtlety 2/0/24 | Pod 17 (5-1) | 69 |
| Priest | #1 | Psychapeute | Discipline 23/3/0 | Pod 39 (6-0) | 78 |
| Priest | #2 | Dakkroth | Discipline 23/3/0 | Pod 31 (6-0) | 72 |
| Priest | #3 | Nieze | Discipline 23/3/0 | Pod 33 (6-0) | 69 |
| Priest | #4 | Lash | Discipline 23/0/3 | Pod 17 (6-0) | 57 |
| Shaman | #1 | Cdewx | Enhancement 0/24/2 | Pod 14 (6-0) | 66 |
| Shaman | #2 | Skeelz | Enhancement 0/23/3 | Pod 43 (6-0) | 63 |
| Shaman | #3 | Luuxiå | 12/14 Enhancement/Restoration hybrid 0/12/14 | Pod 12 (5-1) | 72 |
| Shaman | #4 | Oddwaffletv | 11/15 Enhancement/Restoration hybrid 0/11/15 | Pod 28 (5-1) | 66 |
| Mage | #1 | Yonezka | Frost 2/0/24 | Pod 47 (6-0) | 63 |
| Mage | #2 | Allyana | Arcane 26/0/0 | Pod 8 (5-1) | 70 |
| Mage | #3 | Venruk | Frost 2/0/24 | Pod 36 (5-1) | 69 |
| Mage | #4 | Teleporter | Arcane 22/0/4 | Pod 19 (5-1) | 67 |
| Warlock | #1 | Korleone | Demonology 5/21/0 | Pod 3 (6-0) | 79 |
| Warlock | #2 | Neepzen | Demonology 5/21/0 | Pod 35 (6-0) | 72 |
| Warlock | #3 | Jázggz | Demonology 5/21/0 | Pod 9 (6-0) | 69 |
| Warlock | #4 | Warlockguy | Demonology 5/21/0 | Pod 20 (6-0) | 48 |
| Druid | #1 | Sodapoppin | Restoration 0/0/26 | Pod 18 (6-0) | 72 |
| Druid | #2 | Desmondhume | Restoration 3/0/23 | Pod 8 (5-0-1) | 73 |
| Druid | #3 | Minpojke | Restoration 0/0/26 | Pod 45 (5-1) | 69 |
| Druid | #4 | Snupy | Feral 0/23/3 | Pod 16 (5-1) | 63 |
Tournament Context
The Forever Open was a 1v1 duel tournament on the World of Warcraft: Forever closed beta, organized by Tips Out, Esfand, and Xaryu, with partners including Starforge Systems (Raider.io hosted tournament sign-ups and brackets).
The tournament featured a 100,000 USD prize pool, with 50,000 USD awarded to the champion and 5,555 USD awarded to the top player of each of the nine classes (the champion cannot also take a class award, which passes to the next-highest placing player of that class). The event was Horde-only, per tournament rules.
The prizes page lists 5,555 USD per class; Terms & Conditions §VIII instead says approximately 5,555.56 USD, with residual funds retained by TFO. The Mage shares are therefore approximate. Prize payment remains subject to VOD review and eligibility verification, rather than being confirmed paid.Source: Raider.IO Terms & Conditions, §VIII and finals rules, §§10.1 and 13.4.
| Detail | Summary |
|---|---|
| Event | The Forever Open (Level 30 Horde Beta Duel Tournament) |
| Organizers | Organized by Tips Out, Esfand, and Xaryu; partners include Starforge Systems; brackets hosted on Raider.io |
| Prize Pool | 100,000 USD (50,000 USD to champion, 5,555 USD to top player of each class) |
| Dates | October 17 to October 18, 2026 |
| Qualifier Format | October 17: 6 Swiss rounds (3 points for a win, 1 for a tie) plus class tiebreakers; top 4 of each class (36 players) advanced |
| Finals Format | October 18: 36 finalists in double elimination (best-of-3 upper bracket, best-of-1 lower bracket (best-of-3 lower final), best-of-5 grand final with no bracket reset) |
| Tournament Status | Completed as of 10:53 PM ET: 70 finals matches (117 duels) complete; Warlockguy crowned Champion (3-1) |
Tournament Champion and Top Placings
- Champion (50,000 USD): Warlockguy (Warlock, Demonology) : defeated Neepzen 3-1 in the Grand Finals.
- 2nd Place (5,555 USD Warlock Class Prize): Neepzen (Warlock, Demonology) : Grand Finalist.
- 3rd Place (5,555 USD Shaman Class Prize): Cdewx (Shaman, Enhancement) : reached Lower Bracket Round 10 (Lower Finals).
- 4th Place: Oddwaffletv (Shaman, 11/15 Enhancement/Restoration hybrid) : reached Lower Bracket Round 9.
The 9 Class Prize Winners (5,555 USD Each)
- Top Warlock (5,555 USD): Neepzen (Demonology): finished 2nd overall; awarded class prize as Champion Warlockguy won the 50,000 USD championship purse per tournament rules.
- Top Shaman (5,555 USD): Cdewx (Enhancement): finished 3rd overall, advancing to Lower Bracket Round 10.
- Top Paladin (5,555 USD): Azzu (Retribution): finished tied 5th overall, advancing to Lower Bracket Round 8 (Lamelol eliminated in Lower R7; Gomzy in Lower R6; Reed in Lower R4).
- Top Druid (5,555 USD): Minpojke (Restoration): finished tied 5th overall, advancing to Lower Bracket Round 8 (Sodapoppin eliminated in Lower R5; Desmondhume and Snupy in Lower R3).
- Top Priest (5,555 USD): Nieze (Discipline): finished tied 9th overall, advancing to Lower Bracket Round 6 (Dakkroth eliminated in Lower R5; Lash in Lower R4; Psychapeute in Lower R2).
- Top Rogue (5,555 USD): Justwoo (Subtlety): finished tied 13th overall, advancing to Lower Bracket Round 5 (Chopmaster and Pshero eliminated in Lower R4; Kyroo in Lower R2).
- Top Hunter (5,555 USD): Fvp (Survival): finished tied 13th overall, advancing to Lower Bracket Round 5 (Danmark, Hardfight, and Ryhaz eliminated in Lower R4).
- Top Warrior (5,555 USD): Mag (Protection): finished tied 17th overall, advancing to Lower Bracket Round 4 (Disruptive eliminated in Lower R3; Fracc and Bcw in Lower R2).
- Top Mage (5,555 USD): Split 4 ways (about 1,389 USD each) among all four Mage finalists: Teleporter (Arcane), Yonezka (Frost), Venruk (Frost), and Allyana (Arcane), who were all eliminated in Lower Bracket Round 3 (tied 25th to 32nd overall). Under tournament rules, tied class awards are divided evenly.
Quest Log, 1/39
- Best PvP Classes and Specs in WoW Forever (Level 30 Duel Data)Events
- WoW Forever Soundtrack Arrives on Streaming October 13: Composer Adam Burgess's PreviewNews
- Blizzard Announces Horde Restrictions in Dalaran for WoW ForeverBeta
- WoW Forever at PAX Aus: Longdale on the Biggest Beta, Riverglades and Krol'dokEvents
- The Forever Open: Dates, Prizes and Where to WatchEvents